Clacton Debating Society

April

At the April session, those present discussed a variety of topical issues including whether Mental Health problems are becoming fashionable, Research into Near Death Experiences should be properly funded, Joe Biden is too old for another Presidential term and the BBC should read out the names of all 32,000 killed in Palestine not just the British Aid Workers. A lot of lively and thoughtful views were shared and debated.

March

 The motion for the Debate on March 6th was " That this country needs to return all stolen artifacts to their original owners" It was proposed by Rick Tracey who made a wide-ranging and entertaining case that stolen works of art and antiquity were taken by the British, who were foreign invaders without the right to remove these artifacts from those who had made them. In the case of the Elgin Marbles it is on record that they were paid for but Rick argued that they should be restored to the part of them which is still in Greece, it would be right that they could be viewed in their original location.  
Chris Lane, opposing made two points against the accusation that these treasures have to be returned on moral grounds. a) That  acceptable ethical standards in mid Victorian times were different from ours are now and therefore we  should not judge according to what would pass as right or wrong then. b) Most of what was taken came from small city states or provinces or indeed empires which have now been incorporated into nation states and so they do not exist anymore. The speeches of both speakers were enjoyed; the motion was defeated with several abstentions.
 
February
 

For the February debate, Helen Rees proposed the motion: "Our political leaders have only represented one side of the conflict in the Middle East”. She provided a succinct history of events leading up to the current day crisis starting with the Balfour Declaration of 1917 which expressed the British Government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. She felt that no foreign power should have imposed the sectioning of an Arab land for another nation as it would not have been tolerated anywhere else in the world and had only served to worsen the relationship between Jews and Arabs. She stated that in recent times, the mortality rate was much higher for Palestine but despite this, our politicians only appeared to be supporting Israel.  

Opposer Chris Lane disagreed citing numerous articles where both Conservative and Labour leaders had spoken out against the use of violence on both sides and had specified their support for a more normalised, stable and secure two state solution acting within international, humanitarian law. However he believed that our politicians were right to make it clear that Israel should be able to defend itself against acts of terrorism as long as only reasonable force was used and consideration was given for human life.  Furthermore he asserted that our politicians were trying to encourage a future where the prospect of progress could be made in enabling peace for all concerned.

Following a variety of thought provoking responses from the floor, the motion was overwhelmingly defeated. 

January

Storm Henk  did not put off members turning up in January when Diana Hanna proposed that "Dogs make better companions than Cats". Ann Gilbey opposed the motion. The debate was light hearted, good humoured and with much laughter.  The result was a tie with 3 abstentions