KENT 2020

Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust

INFOACCESS (KENT AND MEDWAY NHS AND SOCIAL CARE PARTNERSHIP TRUST) <kmpt.infoaccess@nhs.net>

FOI ID 25647 - Response

07/06/2021
Good Morning Wendy
 
I write further to your request FOI ID 25647 under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regarding:-
 
ECT Treatment, Serious Incidents, Restraints, Seclusion & Medication Errors
 
Following an investigation and search of our records I can confirm the following Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) information:-
 
Please provide ECT information under the FOI act to the following questions for the Year 2020:
 
  1. Please supply patient’s information ECT leaflet.
Please find attached ECT Leaflet
 
  1. Please supply patient ECT consent form.
Please find attached ECT Consent form
 
  1. Please supply any ECT reports/investigations
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many ECT in 2020?
287 Treatments in total in relation to 29 Patients
 
  1. What proportion of patients were men/women?
Gender Total
Male 10
Female 19
  1. How old were they?
29 patients between ages 27 - 85
 
  1. What were the diagnoses and in what proportions?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. What proportions of patients were classified BAME?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. How many were receiving ECT for the first time?
Gender Total
Male 14
Female 16
 
  1. How many patients consented to ECT?
Gender Total
Male Fewer than 10
Female Fewer than 10
 
  1. How many ECT complaints were investigated outside the NHS and CCG?
0
 
  1. How many patients died during or 1 month after ECT and what was the cause (whether or not ECT was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died a 6 months after ECT and what was the cause (whether or not ECT was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died by suicide within 6  months of receiving ECT (whether or not ECT was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients have suffered complications during and after ECT and what were those complications?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Have there been any formal complaints from patients/relatives about ECT?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. If so, what was their concerns?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. How many patients report memory loss/loss of cognitive function?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. What tests are used to assess memory loss/loss of cognitive function?
Adenbrookes cognitive examination (ACE III)
 
  1. Have MRI or CT scans been used before and after ECT?
Head scans (CT/MRI) are not routinely requested before or after ECT unless there is a specific clinical indication.
 
  1. If so what was the conclusion?
N/A
 
  1. How does the Trust plan to prevent ECT in the future?
ECT is only ever used as a last resort. In line with NICE and RCPsych guidelines the wishes of the patient is of paramount importance and all attempts are made to obtain valid and informed consent
 
Please provide SERIOUS INCIDENT information under the FOI act to the following questions for the Year 2020: 
 
  1. Please supply any serious incident reports/investigations
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS in 2020?
160
 
  1. What proportion of patients were men/women?
Gender Total
Male 96
Female 67
Please note KMPT have SI's where there is more than one patient and some where there are no patients
 
  1. How old were they?
Age Total
80 - 100 Fewer than 10
70 to 79 19
60 to 69 14
50 to 59 27
40 to 49 30
30 to 39 31
20 to 29 29
16 to 19 Fewer than 10
 
  1. What proportion of patients were classified BAME?
Ethnicity Total
Black African Fewer than 10
Indian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and Asian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black African Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Not stated Fewer than 10
White - British 142
White - Irish Fewer than 10
White - Other White Fewer than 10
 
  1. How many SERIUOS INCIDENT REPORTS were investigated outside the NHS and CCG?
0
 
  1. How many patients died during or 1 month after SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS and what was the cause (whether or not SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died within six months after SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS and what was the cause (whether or not SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died by suicide within six months of receiving SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS (whether or not SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients have suffered complications during and after SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS and what were those complications?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Have there been any formal complaints from patients/relatives about SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTS?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
 
  1. If so, what was their concerns?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. How does the Trust plan to prevent SERIOUS INCIDENTS in the future?
Each Serious Incident is investigated using root cause analysis methodology. This enables recommendations to be produced and actions to be developed. The actions are monitored until they are closed. KMPT has recently developed a Central Investigation Team which enables a consistent investigation and shared learning to be discussed. This team meets weekly to discuss cases which allows for trends and themes to be identified. Additionally, the Trust has also recently set up an action plan meeting for Serious Incident investigations. This enables a more cohesive approach to developing actions, including Trust-wide actions. On occasions there are aggregated investigations to allow theme and trend analysis from investigations. The Trust involves families and patients in the investigations to also learn further. The investigations and sometimes cross-organisational and so joint learning is also developed that way. The Trust also has Trust-wide action plans from external Serious Incidents that have been nationally reviewed. There is learning from experience group which enables further learning to be developed and also themes come from other areas such as complaints in this meeting.  Additionally, the investigations are sent to the commissioners who also follow up when deemed required. Care groups take individual learning to their governance meetings for sharing of learning.
 
Please provide restraints information under the FOI Act to the following questions for the year 2020
 
  1. Please supply any Restraints/Investigations
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many RESTRAINTS in 2020?
1593
 
  1. What proportion of patients were men/women?
Gender Total
Male 246
Female 234
Note stated Fewer than 10
Please note some patients are involved in multiple incidents and there are some incidents where the patient was not identified.
 
  1. How old were they?
Age Range Total
90 - 100+ Fewer than 10
80-89 21
70 to 79 29
60 to 69 42
50 to 59 76
40 to 49 79
30 to 39 85
20 to 29 120
10 to 19 25
 
  1. What proportion of patients were classified BAME?
Ethnicity Total
Bangladeshi Fewer than 10
Black African 16
Black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Chinese Fewer than 10
Indian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and Asian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black African Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Not stated 34
Other Asian Fewer than 10
Other ethnic category Fewer than 10
White - British 375
White - Irish Fewer than 10
White - Other White 21
 
  1. How many RESTRAINTS were investigated outside the NHS and CCG ?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
 
  1. How many patients died during or 1 month after RESTRAINTS and what was the cause (whether or not RESTRAINTS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died a within six months after RESTRAINTS and what was the cause (whether or not RESTRAINTS was considered the cause)?
 
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died by suicide within six months of receiving RESTRAINTS (whether or not RESTRAINTS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients have suffered complications during and after RESTRAINTS and what were those complications?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Have there been any formal complaints from patients/relatives about RESTRAINTS?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. If so, what was their concerns?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Are counts of forced injections available
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How does the Trust plan to reduce restraints in the future?
KMPT has the Promoting Safe Services Strategy in place that is aimed at reducing both the use of restrictive practices as well as incidents of aggression. The strategy focusses on primary prevention, addressing the root cause, and many evidenced-based reduction initiatives and practices are already common place within services, e.g. Positive Behaviour Support plans, Safety Huddles and Safe wards.
All uses of restraint are reported and reviewed by manager level and above to identify lessons learnt and to share good practices. Staff receive Physical Intervention training that is based on a Human Rights framework that continually emphasises the least restrictive intervention at all times.
 
Please provide SECLUSION information under the FOI act to the following questions for the Year 2020:
 
  1. Please supply any SECLUSION reports/investigations
 
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many SECLUSION in 2020?
357
 
  1. What proportion of patients were men/women?
Male 95
Female 34
Not Stated Fewer than 10
Please note some patients are involved in multiple incidents and there are some incidents where the patient was not identified.
 
  1. How old were they?
Age Total
100+ Fewer than 10
90-99 Fewer than 10
80-89 Fewer than 10
70 to 79 Fewer than 10
60 to 69 Fewer than 10
50 to 59 15
40 to 49 27
30 to 39 31
20 to 29 42
10 to 19 Fewer than 10
 
  1. What proportion of patients were classified BAME?
Ethnicity  Total
Black African Fewer than 10
Black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Chinese Fewer than 10
Mixed white and Asian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black African Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Not stated Fewer than 10
Other ethnic category Fewer than 10
Pakistani Fewer than 10
White - British 93
White - Irish Fewer than 10
White - Other White Fewer than 10
 
 
  1. How many SECLUSIONS were investigated outside the NHS and CCG ?
0
 
  1. How many patients died during or within one month after SECLUSION and what was the cause (whether or not SECLUSION was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died within six months after SECLUSION and what was the cause (whether or not SECLUSION was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died by suicide within six months of receiving SECLUSION (whether or not SECLUSION was considered the cause)?
 
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients have suffered complications during and after SECLUSION and what were those complications?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Have there been any formal complaints from patients/relatives about SECLUSION?
0
 
  1. If so, what was their concerns?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. How does the Trust plan to prevent SECLUSION in the future?
KMPT has recently reviewed and updated it’s Seclusion Policy; it is based on a Human Rights and values framework and compliant with the MHA Code of Practice (2015). The policy includes primary preventative strategies including trauma informed awareness to ensure that seclusion as always a last resort. All uses of Seclusion are directly reported to a senior management team, ranging from Directors, Matrons and Promoting Safe Services Specialists every 24 hour period which is in addition to the ‘live’ reports via the Trust’s online reporting system. Every seclusion use is reviewed for lessons learnt and sharing. The Promoting Safe Services team provide clinical advice and support to reduce incidents of seclusion use as well as the duration of use. All inpatient clinical staff receives comprehensive training in the use of seclusion, this includes alternatives to seclusion, for example, collaborative Positive Behaviour Care plans and is based on a human rights and ethical framework. The Trust also has the Promoting Safe Services Strategy 2020-2022 is aimed at reducing both uses of restrictive practices and incidents of aggression by implementing evidenced based preventative initiatives and innovations.
 
Please provide MEDICATION ERRORS information under the FOI act to the following questions for the year 2020:
 
  1. Please supply any MEDICATION ERRORS reports/investigations
 
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal  record keeping of an incident investigation. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual investigation records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review investigation records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many MEDICATION ERRORS in 2020?
538
 
  1. What proportion of patients were men/women?
Gender Total
Male 223
Female 165
Not stated Fewer than 10
Please note some patients are involved in multiple incidents and there are some incidents where the patient was not identified.
 
  1. How old were they?
Age Band  
90 - 100 Fewer than 10
80-89 14
70 to 79 39
60 to 69 60
50 to 59 70
40 to 49 63
30 to 39 64
20 to 29 68
10 to 19 Fewer than 10
Not known Fewer than 10
 
  1. What proportion of patients were classified BAME?
Ethnicity  Total
Black African Fewer than 10
Black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Chinese Fewer than 10
Indian Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black African Fewer than 10
Mixed white and black Caribbean Fewer than 10
Not stated 30
Other Asian Fewer than 10
Other Black Fewer than 10
White - British 329
White - Irish Fewer than 10
White - Other White Fewer than 10
 
  1. How many MEDICATION ERRORS S were investigated outside the NHS and CCG?
0
 
  1. How many patients died during or one month after MEDICATION ERRORS and what was the cause (whether or not MEDICATION ERRORS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died within six months after MEDICATION ERRORS and what was the cause (whether or not MEDICATION ERRORS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients died by suicide within six months of receiving MEDICATION ERRORS (whether or not MEDICATION ERRORS was considered the cause)?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. How many patients have suffered complications during and after MEDICATION ERRORS and what were those complications?
All information requested is not routinely collected outside normal medical record keeping. The requested information is not held centrally and is contained within the individual medical records and archive systems which can not be extracted as a stand alone piece of data. In order to extract the requested information and collate the results would require a manual exercise to identify and review medical records and would exceed the appropriate time limits, as per the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 12(1) which does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit. 
 
  1. Have there been any formal complaints from patients/relatives about MEDICATION ERRORS?
Fewer than 5
 
  1. If so, what was their concerns?
Due to the low numbers involved in the response to your request I would like to confirm that we are unable to release the information. We are not obliged, under section 40 (2) FOIA to provide information that is personal information of another person if releasing would contravene any of the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018. In this instance we believe that  the figures are significantly low enough that identification of those involved could be made, and would therefore contravene the first Data Protection principle, therefore section 40 (2) is engaged.
The terms of this exemption in the freedom of information act mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information
 
  1. How does the Trust plan to prevent MEDICATION ERRORS in the future?
KMPT have a medicine safety officer working in our Trust, who’s focus is medicines safety and promoting shared learning not only within the Trust but also networks across organisations so learning is shared across the wider system. KMPT ensure learning from medication incidents is shared through Medicines Management Newsletters and Medication Incidents Learning Bulletin.
KMPT have set up a medicine incident group which meets bimonthly and  is chaired by the medicine safety officer. In these meetings we will:
  • Analyse incidents to identify, prioritise and address medication risks to minimise harm to patients
  • Improving understanding of, reporting of and learning from medication error incidents in the organisation
  • Identifying, developing and promoting best practice for medication safety.
  • Identifying learning from incidents and sharing throughout the Trust
  • Coordinating education and training to improve the quality of medication error incident reports and safe medication practices
  • Assisting in development and review of medication-use policies and procedures
 
I confirm that the information above/attached completes your request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I am also pleased to confirm that no charge will be made for this request.
 
If you have any queries about this response please contact me. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communication.
 
I confirm that the information above/attached completes your request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I am also pleased to confirm that no charge will be made for this request.
 
If you have any questions or concerns or are unhappy with the response provided or the service you have received you can write to the Head of Information Governance at the address on top of this letter.   If you are not content with the outcome of your complaint, you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision.
 
 
 
The Information Governance Department are currently asking for your feedback in their annual IG Awareness Survey, we encourage all staff to complete this by clicking here
 
Kind Regards
 
Anna Planck PC.dp (GDPR)
Deputy Head of Information Governance & Records Management
 
Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust
Information Governance Department
St Michaels House
St Michaels Road
Sittingbourne
Kent, ME10 3DW
 
01795 514531
07468 741605
 
anna.planck@nhs.net
 
www.kmpt.nhs.uk
 
Twitter: kmptnhs
Facebook: kmpt.nhs