History

The car-park in Drummond Place originally formed the showroom end of the "British Engraving Works" from the 1960's to the 1980's, the engaving works extended into what is now known as the Business Park and the white brick wall that backs onto the rear of Godstone Road is now the only remnant of that factory. In the 1980's a proposal was put forward to build the business park and the car-park was clearly intended (from the plans that were passed)  to provide nominated spaces for some of the units as well as some spaces for visitors.

Over the last 20 years or so the Business Park has consistently denied access to the car-park and has even put measures in place to prevent access to anyone - at one stage cars would be clamped there. Last year the business park changed hands and the new owners have decided to try to sell the car-park site (subject to planning permission) to a local developer (Sheen Lane Developments).

The Winchester Road end of the Business Park is not allowed to be used by HGV traffic but what has become clear is that the car-parking within the business park is now at an all time premium there (cars are regularly double-parked there). Whilst some HGV's enter correctly from the Moormead Park entrance (many do not however) they are then forced to leave from the Winchester Road exit making the crossing from the pavement to the foot-bridge even more hazardous than it already is.

Local residents have been eying up the site for a while as a possible Green Hub, this would retain the trees whilst also providing more planting and green space for local residents. The plan would also be to provide electrical car-charging points there and cycle storage shelters which commuters could use when traveling from St Margarets Station.

Residents in Winchester and Godstone Road received letters in July 2020 (shown below) from The Pegasus Group on behalf of Sheen Lane Developments informing us of their intention to submit a planning application to build 4 houses on the existing site of the car-park at St Margarets Business Centre.

It was clear from their letter (and subsequently confirmed by Pegasus via e-mail) that their plans would involve the removal of the existing trees and hedges (all of which are at least 38 years old or more). It was also clear from their letter that the developers were seeking to re-establish the boundary of the site and narrow the pavements considerably.

We know that the St Margarets Business Centre (including the car-park) changed hands at the end of 2018 for £7 900 000 (as shown on the land registry) and we have been told that the car-park site has then been sold Subject To Planning Permission to "Godstone Developments Ltd" who are yet another subsiduary of Sheen Lane Developments.

Richmond Council (LBRUT) placed Tree Preservation Orders (TPO's) on the entire site in October 2019 presumably in anticipation of what they knew was intended and these were confirmed in February 2020. Local residents had their own tree survey made and are working with the South West London Environment Network to monitor bat activity (of which there is plenty it seems).

Developers Letter - July 2020

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Update 24th December 2020 : We finally found out today that Planning Application 20/2664/FUL has now been outright Refused by LBRUT Planning Department on Five grounds:

Loss of ancillary industrial/employment space
Character/design
Parking
Affordable housing
Loss of biodiversity/trees
(Press the REFUSED button to see the document)
So that is fantastic news and a HUGE THANKS is due to everyone who has contributed in any way to make this happen!
Whether or not there will now be an appeal remains to be seen and we will now have to wait to see what is next from the owners/developers. Meantime we are exploring ways to turn the site into a Green Hub.
And...
Some of you may also have seen some developer activity (they were attempting to erect 8 foot hoardings around the entire site) in the car-park recently which led to a stand-off between local residents and Sheen Lane Developments, we are pleased to report that the council have intervened and all the wood has now been removed from the site. Grateful thanks is due to all the local residents who turned out to argue our case and make lots of phone calls to all the right people.
Best wishes to everyone for a better 2021!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

UPDATE OCtober 1st 2020: The planning application (20/2664/FUL) has now been submitted for the development of the car-park at the junction of Winchester Road and Godstone Road and can be seen HERE

All objections should be made online using the "Make a Comment" button before October 22nd. and a list of the valid reasons for objection is shown on the LBRUT Planning Portal HERE
The trees and planting around the car-park were put in place to improve the appearance of the locality as a condition placed upon the business park when it was developed in the 80's. 
There are (despite what the developer says in the application) confirmed Tree Preservation Orders (TPO's) on all the trees and the main fight will be to retain these trees on the grounds of visual-amenity together with the retention of the current boundary of the car-park (as formed by the pavement along Godstone Road and Winchester Road) on the grounds of highway safety for pedestrians. There is abundant wildlife (including bats) which make good use of the current site and objections can also be raised along the lines of nature conservation.
We have commissioned our own Tree Survey and the key findings are as follows;

1. "as a group (the trees) are of landscape value and contribute to the character and appearance of the local landscape. The value of the trees is sufficient to justify their continued protection under the new TPO and the canopy values calculated are significant, implying significant loss to biodiversity, townscape, green infrastructure and likely to yield significant CAVAT values. In light of this and following analysis of the local and regional planning policy we think there is scope to put forward a strong case in opposition of development proposals requiring the loss of all or the majority of these trees."

2. “In support of an objection the canopy volume for all of the onsite trees which may be removed has been

calculated as this demonstrates the potential loss of the urban forest. The total canopy volume which could

be lost equates to 2,940.4m3…

3. “It is clear that the loss of canopy volume would be significant if these trees were removed and arguably,

contrary to local and regional (London) policy."

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx